Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jarmere Jenkins vs Blake Mott Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jenkins vs Mott analysis and find out who is favored!
Jarmere Jenkins vs Blake Mott Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jenkins 2 - 0 Mott
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jenkins has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Mott has won 43.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jenkins, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mott has won 54.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 32.86% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jenkins has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mott has saved 52.76% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jenkins has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Mott winning 69.01% (W/L 49/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jenkins has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 106/ 59), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Mott has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 191/ 131), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jenkins winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Jenkins winning 4 and Mott winning 0. The last match between Jenkins and Mott was at the Australia F7, 09-10-2016, Final, Hard with Jarmere Jenkins getting the victory 7-6(5) 7-6(2).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jenkins and Mott have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jenkins winning 0 times and Mott 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Jenkins winning 2, and Mott 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jenkins has played against opponents with an average rank of while Mott has played against players with an average rank of 187.24.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jenkins has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mott has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jenkins has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mott has converted 41.88% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
190
High
33
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
355
Rank
220
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
63% (152-90)
Career Total W/L
58% (224-165)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
62% (16-10)
$835
Career Prize Money
$133,500
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jarmere Jenkins | Blake Mott |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 26 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:0 | 1:5:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (54/103) | 71% (67/95) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (38/54) | 64% (43/67) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (23/49) | 32% (9/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 27% (4/15) | 21% (4/19) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (43/95) | 41% (42/103) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Jarmere Jenkins
Player
Blake Mott
52%
(
54 of
103)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
95)
11
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
6
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jarmere Jenkins | Blake Mott |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (16/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (36/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (306/286) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (15/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 61 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.4 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 115 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:48:4 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 278.58 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 71% (1249/1766) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (853/1249) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (224/517) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (79/187) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (748/1827) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (12/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (16/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 83% (5/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 30% (10/3) |
Jarmere Jenkins Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Darren K. Polkinghorne
Player
Jarmere Jenkins
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
47%
(
20 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
44
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jarmere Jenkins
Player
Jesse Delaney
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Jarmere Jenkins
Player
N.Sriram Balaji
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
4
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
49
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jarmere Jenkins
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jarmere Jenkins
Player
David Barclay
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jarmere Jenkins
Player
Thomas Fancutt
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shuichi Sekiguchi
Player
Jarmere Jenkins
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gavin Van Peperzeel
Player
Jarmere Jenkins
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
9
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Jarmere Jenkins
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Blake Mott Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Blake Mott
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
72%
(
78 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
5
Aces
11
9
Double Faults
4
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
46 of
68)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
44 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
107
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Ricardas Berankis
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yshai Oliel
Player
Blake Mott
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve %
87%
(
83 of
95)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
51 of
83)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Charles Broom
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Blake Mott
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Giles Hussey
87%
(
67 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Shintaro Imai
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
53 of
97)
110
Total Points Won
85
|
6-0 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Michael Shaw
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Blake Mott
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
81%
(
78 of
96)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
49 of
78)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jenkins Vs Mott Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
